🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam decision, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to employ a redrawn congressional map that could add as many as five additional Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 decision, handed down on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to lift a district court's ruling that had struck down the new map in November.

Court's Explanation

The federal judge erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, causing considerable confusion and upsetting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its ruling.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely sorted voters based on their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the new maps. It had instructed the state to use the maps established after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissent

Through a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's ruling. She contended that it undermined the work of the lower court, pointing out that its opinion was crafted by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan argued in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its increased favoritism, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

National Redistricting Struggle

The ruling is part of a countrywide contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican hold. Ordinarily, redistricting takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that could add a number of more GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, in response, have pushed back with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Responses

The Texas top lawyer hailed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes favorable to Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

Conversely, opposition party leaders decried the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another senior Democratic leader argued the court had another time eroded its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he stated.